Open Burning Ban Update for Allegheny County

On January 21, 2014 Clean Air Council attended a Regulation Subcommittee meeting of Allegheny County Air Pollution Control Advisory Committee to present a “No Burn” Model proposal to the committee to consider for revision of its open burning regulations. The suggestion was supported by the American Lung Association in a letter to the committee.  Also attending the meeting in support of the model regulation was the Executive Director of Women for a Healthy Environment.  By consensus vote the proposal was rejected by the committee which pursued options less protective of public health.

As a follow up, Clean Air Council attended the March 11, 2014 meeting of the Regulation Subcommittee.  The Council did not comment on the specific wording changes of the regulation being addressed by the subcommittee proceedings.  The Council did comment at the end of the considerations that protection of public health was not being maximized by the County’s revised regulation and objected that it was being recommended to the full Allegheny County Air Pollution Control Advisory Committee in its present form.  The Chairman of the Regulation Subcommittee recognized the Council’s objection and invited  comment in the public comment period after approval by the whole Advisory Committee.


Model Legislation on Banning Open Burning


Open Burning Ban in Allegheny County

The Allegheny County Health Department is currently in the process of revising its open-burning regulations.  The Health Department is still in preliminary stages, and proposed revisions have yet to be released.  The Clean Air Council is advocating for an open-burning ban within Allegheny County due to the greater Pittsburgh area’s dense population and the harmful effects of wood smoke associated with incomplete combustion resulting from open fire.  In January 2014, the Council presented the Health Department with draft regulations that ban open-burning with limited exceptions [perhaps link to the attachment?].  This policy is the only approach that will ensure adequate protection of human health.  We will continue to update this page with developments regarding the Health Department’s revisions to ensure that the public is aware of opportunities to influence this decision-making process.

Join the Campaign

Join Clean Air Council  at the upcoming Allegheny County Health Department public hearing on Tuesday, July 1, 2014, at 10:00 AM,  to voice your support and present you comments on an open burning ban in Allegheny County.  The hearing will be held in the First Floor Conference Room at Building #7 of the Clack Health Center, 301 39th Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15201 for proposed amendments to Rules and Regulations on Open Burning.
Contact Thurman Brendlinger, or 215-567-4004, Ext. 104 if you plan on presenting comments or have questions about the issue.

Click on the image below to view or download the entire fact sheet.


Biomass Facilities


“Biomass energy is growing in importance because of a desire to move away from fossil fuels and toward renewable sources of energy and energy independence. Also, alternative energy portfolio standards requiring energy companies to use alternative sources for a percentage of the energy they sell are encouraging industry to invest in biomass. Biomass energy is listed as a Tier I alternative energy source in Pennsylvania.1 The other Tier I alternative energy sources in the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act (AEPS) are solar photo-voltaic and solar thermal energy, wind power, low-impact hydro-power, geothermal energy, biologically derived methane gas, fuel cells, and coal mine methane.2 The act requires that at least 8 percent of the electric energy sold by an electric distribution company or electric generation supplier to retail electric customers in the Commonwealth must be generated from Tier I alternative energy sources by 2020.

“Biomass is enticing because of the promise of carbon neutrality. The idea is that carbon emissions from biomass are offset by the prior absorption of carbon through photosynthesis, and the carbon will be reabsorbed when new biomass is grown. However, this carbon cycle would take place over many years because of the time needed to plant and grow new sources. It is also possible that biomass might be harvested at unsustainable rates and produce air pollution and net greenhouse gas emissions.”

Click here or on the image below to download the entire paper on biomass facilities and their potential impact.


Health Impacts of Wood Smoke

Many people don’t think of wood smoke as a major health or environmental concern, but the truth is quite the opposite.  Wood smoke contains many harmful carcinogens in addition to sulfur, mercury, nitrogen-oxides, and carbon-dioxide.  Soot and ash are additional problems as they can work their way deep into lung tissue.  All totaled, one wood stove or boiler can have thousands of times the emissions of one using natural gas – contributing greatly to health and environmental degradation.

One of the principal problems with wood-burning is that the impacts are often local.  Wood smoke is released close to the ground from low chimneys or smoke stacks, where the soot and toxins mix with the ambient air.  This are is then breathed in by local residents, causing new medical conditions and aggravating existing ones.

Washington State has put together an informational booklet about wood-smoke, available here, that goes into greater detail about its impacts on health and the environment, best practices, and what you can do in your community.  Also check out our resource page for more information on biomass and the impacts of wood-smoke.

GreenSpace: Major U.S. polluters? Wood-burning stoves

Sandy Bauers, Inquirer GreenSpace Columnist

Posted: Sunday, January 5, 2014, 8:51 AM

A fire in the fireplace or woodstove can help you almost forget winter.

Just don’t expect Joseph Otis Minott to enjoy it with you. The executive director of the Clean Air Council, based in Philadelphia, doesn’t think of the words toasty and cozy when he thinks of fires.

He thinks of air pollution.

Like burning leaves – the ones that fall from trees in au- tumn and the ones we grow as tobacco – burning wood emits many harmful compounds, in- cluding the carcinogen benzene.

The emission that most concerns Minott is fine particulates – microscopic bits of matter that lodge deep in the lungs, often with other pollutants attached.

They’ve been linked to premature death in people with heart or lung disease, nonfatal heart attacks, decreased lung function, and a worsening of other respiratory symptoms, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

That fire “may be nostalgic and give you the warm-and- fuzzies,” Minott said, “but envi- ronmentally, there are issues.”

The emissions can be bad for you if you’re in the same room as the fire, and bad for your neighbors if they’re downwind of your chimney.

In general, woodstoves are more efficient than fireplaces – especially stoves or fireplace inserts with catalytic combustors that reduce emissions. But fireplaces are used more sporadically.

What concerns Minott even more is that wood is being promoted as a renewable resource, a greener option to oil or other fossil fuels. (Not to mention a cheaper one, especially for someone living on a wooded property.)

So the nation’s 29 million fireplaces and 12 million woodstoves are on the rise. Recent U.S. census figures showed that from 2000 to 2010, home heating with wood and wood pellets grew 34 percent, faster than any other heating fuel.

In all but the most efficient woodstoves, the pollution emitted for the heat generated is higher than for other kinds of

fuel, said Kevin Stewart, director of environmental health for the Mid-Atlantic region of the American Lung Association.

“We recognize that this is a growing source of air pollution,” he said.

In October, the Clean Air Council and the American Lung Association joined other nonprofits and health groups in suing the EPA to force it to update woodstove and fire- place emissions standards that date to 1988.

But Bret Watson, president of the stove manufacturer Jotul North America, contended “further regulation of modern clean-burning woodstoves will essentially do nothing to improve air-shed quality.” He said new standards wouldn’t address the five million to seven million dirty stoves in use now.

To that end, Jotul instituted a stove change-out program over the summer, offering a $300 credit to people who exchanged their old stoves for a new Jotul. The company also donated $10 a stove – a total of $14,500 – to the American Lung Association.

Watson said Jotul would likely repeat the program this year.

John Ackerly, president of the Alliance for Green Heat in Maryland, has a foot in both camps.

“We’re a pro-wood-heating group,” he said, “but we pretty much agree with the strict regulations that environmental groups want. We think that’s the best way for the industry to move forward, to be cleaner.”

Cleaner-burning stoves “will allow the sector to take off,” he said, “and not play second fid- dle to solar and geothermal.”

The alliance recently held a woodstove design challenge, demonstrating that stoves of the future will be automated, with sensors that regulate the air flow to get a more complete burn.

Most people close the air intake too soon, he said. “As long as a human being operates it, even the best stove can create a hell of a lot of smoke.”

GreenSpace: Tips for Better Burning

Whatever wood-burning device you have, here are tips for safer and less-polluting wood fires from the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency’s Burn Wise program.

Burn only dry wood that has been seasoned at least six months.

Start fires with clean newspaper and dry kindling.

Burn hot fires.

Never burn garbage, plastic, or pressure-treated wood.

Have your chimney cleaned annually by a certified chimney sweep.

“GreenSpace,” about the environment and health, appears every other week, alternating with Art Carey’s “Well Being” column.

215-854-5147 @sbauers